The demand for high-paying hybrid job opportunities has decreased.

• The likelihood of employees rejecting a full-time office job increases with higher salary.
• The tension in the return-to-office dance is due to the disconnect between what employers are offering and what highly paid workers desire.
• Highly paid workers, in particular, have experienced the benefits of hybrid flexibility and are unwilling to relinquish it.

High-paying hybrid work is here to stay — or is it?

Nearly 70% of six-figure hybrid job availability decreased, while in-person job posts nearly doubled, according to the Q4 2023 High Paying Jobs report from jobs platform Ladders.

But six-figure-and-up workers are not taking this situation lying down.

According to Owl Labs' State of Hybrid Work 2023 report, employees with higher salaries are less likely to accept a full-time office job and more likely to seek hybrid flexibility in their work.

The tension in the return-to-office dance is due to the disconnect between what employers are offering and what highly paid workers desire.

Frank Weishaupt, CEO of Owl Labs, stated that employers, managers, and employees are all treading carefully at the moment.

Many large companies, including Boeing and UPS, are pushing for employees to return to the office, believing it will maximize their value, particularly in difficult economic times. However, employees, including highly paid workers, have become accustomed to managing their personal and professional lives with hybrid flexibility and are unwilling to give it up.

'The tragedy of the commons'

"There is a different standard where we discuss the high-income bracket," said Rick Smith, professor of practice in management and organization at the Johns Hopkins Carey Business School.

Smith stated that managers and other high-paid leaders should relinquish some of their self-indulgence in order to promote more remote or hybrid flexibility, in order to prevent the "tragedy of the commons," a situation where individuals act solely in their own self-interest, resulting in harm to the common good.

Smith suggests that while remote work may benefit individual workers, it may not benefit the common good of the organization. However, as workers climb the corporate ladder, they owe more to the organization.

The future of work demands a balance between employees and employers, where the office is a reward and inflexible rules are flexible.

The office as a meaningful experience

Smith proposes that companies who bring hybrid workers back to the office for a portion of their workday will be more intelligent about the purpose and objectives of those office visits.

Instead of focusing on individual work, the in-office experience will be more impactful through events, collaboration, and other unifying activities that energize workers and enhance their productivity.

Beyond the mandate

Is it true that companies like IBM and JPMorgan Chase have a firm return-to-office mandate? While it may appear that way, experts believe that blanket policies are not always effective.

Weishaupt believes that higher-paid work will have more accountability to the office, but he noted, "You won't be able to acquire the talent you want if you don't provide flexibility."

John Mullinix, the director of growth marketing at Ladders, agrees that smart companies should negotiate with their employees to retain the best talent while maintaining a healthy work-life balance. If work-life balance is being compromised, employees may be able to negotiate higher salaries as a result.

Weishaupt acknowledges that managing individualized schedules becomes more challenging with larger companies comprising thousands of individuals. Nevertheless, he asserts that there is room for flexibility and creativity at the managerial level. "I believe you're not seeing the full picture when it comes to that narrowly-defined mandate," he stated.

While hybrid job postings are decreasing, experts believe that there is more to be said. They suggest that these discussions should take place during the employment negotiation process.

Smith stated that if organizations implement policies requiring employees to be in the office from 9 to 5, Monday through Friday, they will experience attrition, particularly among those with families, women, and accessibility needs.

Women, who are the majority of primary caregivers in the U.S., want more work-from-home days than men. Despite this, they receive fewer work-from-home days than men after Covid. Hybrid flexibility in all roles, including highly paid ones, is an equity issue that goes beyond work-life balance.

Smith believes that organizational leaders should recognize the importance of hybrid flexibility to avoid limiting job accessibility and losing out on top talent.

To join the CNBC Workforce Executive Council, apply at cnbccouncils.com/wec.